Verify before acting
Every takedown notice is backed by evidence and confirmed by an analyst. Mistaken notices damage trust with providers and expose our customers to counter-claims, so we do not send them.
ThreatWarder exists because the people who abuse a brand move faster than the people defending it. We built a platform and a team that close that gap: continuous detection, careful verification and takedowns that actually get completed.
Most brand protection still happens in a shared inbox. A customer reports a fake login page, someone finds the hosting provider's abuse address, writes an email, and hopes. Weeks later the page is still up, or it has moved to a new domain and nobody noticed.
We started ThreatWarder to replace that process with one that works at the scale attackers operate. Our detection runs around the clock across the web, new domains, certificates, social platforms and app stores. Every confirmed threat becomes a case with evidence attached, and every case is pushed through the registrar, host, platform or DMCA agent that can remove it, with follow-up until it is gone.
Our customers are security, legal and brand teams at banks, software companies, retailers, media groups and game studios. What they have in common is a name worth stealing and a team that would rather spend its time on something other than chasing abuse desks.
Every takedown notice is backed by evidence and confirmed by an analyst. Mistaken notices damage trust with providers and expose our customers to counter-claims, so we do not send them.
A takedown is only as good as the recipient. We maintain abuse contacts, submission formats and escalation paths for registrars, hosts, CDNs, search engines, social platforms and app stores.
Customers see every case, every notice, every response and every outcome. If a provider stalls, you know. If a threat comes back, you know that too.
Alerts go where your team already works: SIEM, ticketing, chat. Indicators are available through an API so your own controls can block what we find.
We collect what is needed to detect and document abuse, keep it only as long as it is useful, and describe exactly how it is handled in our Trust center.
Volume detected, time to takedown and removal rate are the numbers that matter. They are visible in the product, not just in a quarterly deck.
The team combines people who ran abuse desks at hosting providers, analysts who handled fraud cases at financial institutions, engineers who built large-scale crawling and classification systems, and lawyers who have filed more DMCA notices than they care to count. That mix is deliberate: effective takedowns need all four perspectives.
We are a distributed team working across Europe and North America. If that sounds like a place you would like to work, see our open roles.